Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

PSPSOHS603A Mapping and Delivery Guide
Analyse and evaluate OHS risk

Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency PSPSOHS603A - Analyse and evaluate OHS risk
Description This unit covers the outcomes required to conduct a formal risk assessment comprising analysis and evaluation of OHS risk. It has been designed to be consistent with Australian Standard AS/NZS 4360: Risk Management (1999), or as revised. In practice, analysing and evaluating OHS risk may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector work activities such as promoting ethical practice, applying government systems, influencing opinion, fostering leadership, managing resources, managing compliance with legislation.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of endorsement.
Employability Skills This unit contains employability skills.
Learning Outcomes and Application This unit addresses the knowledge, processes and techniques necessary to analyse and evaluate OHS risk as part of the risk management process.OHS risk analysis involves defining the range of consequences, assessing the effectiveness of existing controls and deciding the likelihood of each consequence - and combining these in some way to obtain a level of risk. Risk evaluation is the comparison of pre-established criteria for tolerance and the subsequent ranking of risks requiring control.The situation to be analysed and evaluated may involve a single task or a process comprising a series of tasks.
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites Not applicable.
Competency Field Specialist Occupational Health&Safety
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities 		Slides
PPT 		Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Define parameters of the OHS risk study
  • Information and data on the hazard identification process and the context of the OHS risk are accessed.
  • The scopeof the OHS risk study is established.
  • The activity to be analysed is divided into logical and manageable elements.
  • The methodof OHS risk analysis is defined and documented.
       
Element: Analyse the OHS risk of a task or process
  • The nature of the hazard including the process of injury or damage is clarified.
  • The need for further information such as monitoring activities is identified.
  • Information and data about the OHS risk are communicated to stakeholders.
  • A range of stakeholders is consulted and involved in the analysis.
  • Existing controls are identified and their effectiveness evaluated, taking account of relevant standards.
  • Specific scenarios to be considered are determined.
  • From the various scenarios possible consequences and the likelihood of their occurrence are determined.
  • Steps are undertaken to ensure comprehensive analysisof information, data and techniques.
  • The OHS risks are ranked in order of level of risk.
  • OHS specialist advisers are consulted if required.
       
Element: Evaluate OHS risk of a task or process
  • Relevant legislation, codes of practice and standards are accessed and referenced.
  • Stakeholders are consulted in determining criteria for OHS risk evaluation.
  • Outcomes of OHS risk analysis are compared with criteria to identify risks requiring further risk control and risks deemed as low as reasonably achievable.
  • Process and outcomes of analysis and evaluation are documented in a manner that is accessible and facilitates understanding by the stakeholders.
  • Documentation of outcomes includes explanation of the legal ramifications of decision making based on risk prioritisation.
       


Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the unit descriptor, performance criteria, The range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.

Units to be assessed together

Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include:

PSPETHC601B Maintain and enhance confidence in public service

PSPGOV605A Persuade and influence opinion

PSPLEGN601B Manage compliance with legislation in the public sector

PSPSOHS604A Apply ergonomic principles to control OHS risk

PSPSOHS605A Apply occupational hygiene principles to control OHS risk.

Overview of evidence requirements

In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:

knowledge requirements of this unit

skill requirements of this unit

application of employability skills as they relate to this unit.

Resources required to carry out assessment

Resources essential for assessment include:

legislation, policy, procedures and protocols relating to the analysis and evaluation of OHS risk

workplace documentation, case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of situations likely to be encountered when analysing and evaluating OHS risk.

Where and how to assess evidence

Valid assessment of this unit requires:

a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when analysing and evaluating OHS risk, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine

analysis and evaluation of OHS risk in a range of 3 or more contexts or occasions, over time.

Assessment methods should reflect but not exceed workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of individuals who might be disadvantaged.

Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this unit must use authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses and may include a combination of two or more of:

workplace projects

simulation or role plays

case studies and scenarios

observation.

portfolios.

The assessment environment should not disadvantage the candidate and where the person has a disability the principle of reasonable adjustment should be applied during assessment.

For consistency of assessment

Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments.

Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)

Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Required skills:

Look for evidence that confirms skills in:

relating to people from a range of social, cultural and ethnic backgrounds and physical and mental abilities

communicating effectively with personnel at all levels of organisation and OHS specialists and, as required, emergency service personnel

preparing reports for a range of target groups including OHS committee, OHS representatives, managers, supervisors and other stakeholders

applying continuous improvement and action planning processes

managing own tasks within time frame

using consultation and negotiation skills, particularly in relation to developing plans and implementing and monitoring designated actions

contributing to the assessment of the resources needed to systematically manage OHS and, where appropriate, access resources

analysing relevant workplace information and data, make observations including of workplace tasks and interactions between people, their activities, equipment, environment and systems

carrying out simple arithmetical calculations (eg % change), and producing graphs of workplace information and data to identify trends and recognise limitations of information and data

using a range of communication media

conducting effective formal and informal meetings

using language and literacy skills appropriate to the workgroup and the task

using computer and information technology skills to access internal and external information and data on OHS

undertaking basic research to access relevant information and data

paying attention to detail when making observations and recording outcomes.

Required knowledge:

Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:

roles and responsibilities under OHS legislation of employees including supervisors, contractors, OHS inspectors etc

principles of duty of care including concepts of causation, foreseeability, preventability

legislative requirements for OHS information and data, and consultation

roles and responsibilities in relation to communication and consultation for OHS committees, OHS representatives, line management, employees and inspectors

state/territory/Commonwealth OHS legislation (Acts, regulations, codes of practice, associated standards and guidance material) including prescriptive and performance approaches and links to other relevant legislation such as industrial relations, equal employment opportunity, workers compensation, rehabilitation etc

structure and forms of legislation including regulations, codes of practice, associated standards and guidance material

difference between hazard and risk

risk as a measure of uncertainty and the factors that affect risk

principles of incident causation and injury processes

principles of human behaviour and response to interactions with human, physical and task environment to identify psychosocial hazards

knowledge of a range of risk analysis/assessment techniques and tools and the application and limitations of those techniques and tools

standard industry controls for a range of hazards

types of hazard identification tools including JSA

limitations of generic hazard and risk checklists and risk ranking processes

pertinent sections of relevant Australian and other standards such as AS/NZS 4360: Risk management, National Standard for the Storage and Handling

requirements for control of work permits/written authorities in workplace monitoring activities

principles and practices of a systematic approach to managing OHS

range of risk analysis/assessment techniques and tools and their application and limitations

requirements of OHS and standards related to systematically managing OHS

other function areas that impact on the management of OHS

internal and external sources of OHS information and data

how the characteristics and composition of the workforce impact on risk and the systematic approach to managing OHS eg

labour market changes

structure and organisation of workforce eg part-time, casual and contract workers, shift rosters, geographical location

language, literacy and numeracy

communication skills

cultural background/workplace diversity

gender

workers with special needs

benefits, limitations and use of a range of communication strategies and tools appropriate to the workplace

organisational behaviour and culture as it impacts on OHS and on change

ethics related to professional practice

organisational OHS policies and procedures

nature of workplace processes (including work flow, planning and control) and hazards relevant to the particular workplace

sources of occupational disease and their prevention

knowledge of toxicology of hazardous materials and potential health effects in the workplace

formal and informal communication and consultation processes and key personnel related to communication

language, literacy and cultural profile of the work group

organisational culture as it impacts on the workgroup

The range statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The range statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance criteria is explained here.

Ahazardis

a source or situation with a potential for harm in terms of human injury or ill health, damage to property or the environment, or a combination of these

Context includes descriptionof

workplace

activities

internal and external factors that impact on OHS risk

stakeholders

level of documentation required

controls currently in place

Riskis

the chance of something happening that will result in injury or damage

measured in terms of consequences (injury or damage) and likelihood of the consequence

Scope of OHS risk studycovers

why it is being done

who will use the output and for what purpose

activities, job role, area, location to be analysed

Method of OHS risk analysis

may be agreed by the parties or may be defined by standards or legislation

Monitoring activitiesmay include but not be limited to

air monitoring

noise monitoring

medical monitoring

Information and data about the OHS riskincludes

the outcomes of OHS risk analysis

mode/s of action of the hazard causing injury or damage

Stakeholdersinclude

managers, including boards of management

employees and their representatives

customers/users of the product or process

the community

Controlsare

actions implementing risk management decisions, programs or policies; may involve monitoring, re-evaluation and compliance with decisions

Effectiveness of controls

may be determined by detailed investigation; alternatively, consideration of the hierarchy of control may be sufficient

Relevant standardsinclude

legislation

codes of practice and guidance material

Australian and industry standards

current practice

current knowledge

common law duty of care

Consequenceis

the injury or damage outcome of an event which may be expressed quantitatively or qualitatively; there may be a range of possible outcomes for a specific event or scenario

Likelihoodrefers to

the likelihood of the occurrence of the consequence; not the likelihood of the hazard or the particular scenario

Comprehensive analysis of information and datamay include

past records

experience with enterprise, own/other industries

published literature

research within exposed groups

engineering modelling

specialist and expert groups

Comprehensive analysis of techniquesmay include

broad consultation

multidisciplinary focus groups

structured interviews

questionnaires

processes and techniques used by specialists, such as modelling, fault tree and Hazard and Operability Studies (HazOps)

Risk rankingis

a process of rating risks according to their severity and likelihood; common systems are based on matrices or nomograms

OHS specialist advisorsmay include

engineers

ergonomists

occupational hygienists

safety professionals

occupational health practitioners

toxicologists

psychologists

people skilled in applying advanced risk analysis processes, such as modelling, fault tree, HazOps and Management Oversight and Risk Tree (MORT)

Risk evaluationis

the comparison of risk with pre-established criteria for tolerance (or as low as reasonably achievable) and the subsequent ranking of risks requiring control

Criteria may be establishedby

reference to established codes and standards

consultation

Documentation of risk analysisshould include

methods used

groups involved/consulted

description of consequences and their likelihood

information and data used in estimates

assumptions

effectiveness of existing controls

uncertainty in analysis

factors affecting level of risk

further information/data and/or investigation required

Documentation of risk evaluationshould include

method used to determine the criteria

groups consulted/involved

criteria determined

list of risks and schedule for action

statement of the legal ramifications of decision making based on risk prioritisation

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Information and data on the hazard identification process and the context of the OHS risk are accessed. 
The scopeof the OHS risk study is established. 
The activity to be analysed is divided into logical and manageable elements. 
The methodof OHS risk analysis is defined and documented. 
The nature of the hazard including the process of injury or damage is clarified. 
The need for further information such as monitoring activities is identified. 
Information and data about the OHS risk are communicated to stakeholders. 
A range of stakeholders is consulted and involved in the analysis. 
Existing controls are identified and their effectiveness evaluated, taking account of relevant standards. 
Specific scenarios to be considered are determined. 
From the various scenarios possible consequences and the likelihood of their occurrence are determined. 
Steps are undertaken to ensure comprehensive analysisof information, data and techniques. 
The OHS risks are ranked in order of level of risk. 
OHS specialist advisers are consulted if required. 
Relevant legislation, codes of practice and standards are accessed and referenced. 
Stakeholders are consulted in determining criteria for OHS risk evaluation. 
Outcomes of OHS risk analysis are compared with criteria to identify risks requiring further risk control and risks deemed as low as reasonably achievable. 
Process and outcomes of analysis and evaluation are documented in a manner that is accessible and facilitates understanding by the stakeholders. 
Documentation of outcomes includes explanation of the legal ramifications of decision making based on risk prioritisation. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

PSPSOHS603A - Analyse and evaluate OHS risk
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Assessment Record Sheet

PSPSOHS603A - Analyse and evaluate OHS risk

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: